foxit pdf editor pro vs adobe acrobat pro

FOXIT PDF EDITOR PRO VS ADOBE ACROBAT PRO FULL
FOXIT PDF EDITOR PRO VS ADOBE ACROBAT PRO TRIAL

Both Wondershares PDFelement and Foxit PDF Editor benefit from a wide range of features and are true all-rounders when it comes to handling PDF files. However, it would go beyond the scope to highlight every single feature, which is why we have limited ourselves to the most important basics. Of course, we do not want to withhold the range of functions of both programs. So up to this point, it’s all a matter of taste. The Foxit PDF Editor, on the other hand, seems a bit cluttered, but scores with larger icons. Nevertheless, Wondershare’s PDFelement seems to be a bit more intuitive in terms of this. User interface Wondershare PDFelementĪs a result, the menu navigation of both tools is similar. All in all, both programs convey a similarity to well-known office applications. PDFelement, on the other hand, is mainly blue and white, which makes the interface look a bit retro, but also tidier. The basic functions differ from each other in color and lighten up the user interface. In terms of design, Foxit PDF Editor comes out on top in our view after opening the software.

FOXIT PDF EDITOR PRO VS ADOBE ACROBAT PRO TRIAL

In addition, the user cannot use the OCR feature with the trial version, which means PDFelement may not recognize text passages in images reliably or at all.That is, should a file with, for example, 5 pages be converted, the trial version spits out only 2 pages. When a PDF file is converted to another format, such as Word or Excel, this process is limited to 2 pages.Changes made to a PDF file will result in a watermark being added to each page of the document when it is saved.These restrictions must be accepted with the trial version:

FOXIT PDF EDITOR PRO VS ADOBE ACROBAT PRO FULL

However, this can only be used to its full extent after the software has been purchased. Wondershare, on the other hand, grants the user unlimited access to the trial version. The latter can be used to its full extent during the test phase, but is unusable once it expires. Both PDFelement and Foxit PDF Editor have advantages and disadvantages. However, for the sake of completeness, a comparison of both test versions is useful. We don’t want to say too many words about it. Test versions in comparison: PDFelement vs. After all, we want to find out what the respective software can do. Nevertheless, we have installed both tools. Thus, in our opinion, Foxit PDF Editor’s offer is aimed more at the business sector. However, while the trial version on the manufacturer’s site of the former can be downloaded quite simply with a click, the developer of the latter first asks for a handful of personal data including the name of a company. The First Impressionīoth Wondershare’s PDFelement and Foxit PDF Editor are easy to find via search engine. Both are promising tools, which we put to the test in this post. However, there are also a number of alternatives, such as the Foxit PDF Editor or PDFelement from Wondershare. The best-known representative of this is probably the Adobe Acrobat software from the market leader. However, if a PDF file needs to be converted into another format or the scope of editing with standard programs is no longer sufficient, another solution is required. Edit, create or manage PDF files? You can do this with a wide range of software.

Foxit pdf editor pro vs adobe acrobat pro